(in Spanish)

ATLANTA — Venezuela’s 2024 presidential election didn’t meet worldwide requirements of electoral integrity and can’t be thought of democratic.

The Carter Heart can not confirm or corroborate the outcomes of the election declared by the Nationwide Electoral Council (CNE), and the electoral authority’s failure to announce disaggregated outcomes by polling station constitutes a critical breach of electoral ideas.

Venezuela’s electoral course of didn’t meet worldwide requirements of electoral integrity at any of its phases and violated quite a few provisions of its personal nationwide legal guidelines. The election came about in an atmosphere of restricted freedoms for political actors, civil society organizations, and the media. All through the electoral course of, the CNE demonstrated a transparent bias in favor of the incumbent.

Voter registration was harm by quick deadlines, comparatively few locations of registration, and minimal public data. Residents overseas confronted extreme authorized necessities to register, a few of which gave the impression to be arbitrary. This successfully disenfranchised a lot of the migrant inhabitants, leading to very low numbers of voters overseas.

The registration of events and candidates additionally didn’t meet worldwide requirements. Over the previous few years, a number of opposition events have had their registrations modified to leaders who favor the federal government. This influenced the nomination of some opposition candidates. Importantly, the registration of the candidacy of the primary opposition forces was topic to arbitrary choices of the CNE, with out respecting primary authorized ideas.

The electoral marketing campaign was impacted by unequal circumstances amongst candidates. The marketing campaign of the incumbent president was effectively funded and extensively seen by means of rallies, posters, murals, and avenue campaigning. The abuse of administrative sources on behalf of the incumbent — together with use of presidency autos, public officers campaigning whereas of their official capability, and use of social applications — was noticed all through the marketing campaign.

The incumbent additionally loved overwhelming constructive protection on tv and radio, when it comes to promoting, broadcast occasions, and information protection, whereas the first opposition candidate acquired little media protection. As well as, authorities ceaselessly tried to limit the opposition’s marketing campaign actions. This included harassment or intimidation of people that offered companies or items to the primary opposition marketing campaign.

Nonetheless, Venezuelan residents turned out peacefully and in massive numbers to precise their will on election day. Regardless of reviews of restrictions on entry to many polling facilities for home observers and opposition celebration witnesses; potential stress on the voters, similar to ruling celebration checkpoints within the neighborhood of voting facilities; and incidents of pressure or violence reported in some localities; Voting appeared to happen in a typically civil method.

Within the restricted variety of polling facilities they visited, Carter Heart observer groups famous the will of the Venezuelan individuals to take part in a democratic election course of, as demonstrated by means of their lively participation as polling workers, celebration witnesses, and citizen observers. Nevertheless, their efforts had been undermined by the CNE’s full lack of transparency in saying the outcomes.

Translation

Declaration of the Carter Center on the Election in Venezuela (PDF)

,

In regards to the Carter Heart technical election commentary mission in Venezuela
The Carter Heart was invited by the CNE to look at the presidential election in March 2024 and signed a memorandum of understanding to ensure that the mission might observe freely in accordance with the Heart’s normal methodology. The Carter Heart deployed 17 consultants and observers beginning on June 29, together with groups primarily based in Caracas, Barinas, Maracaibo, and Valencia. The mission met with a variety of stakeholders, together with the CNE, candidates, political events, civil society organizations, citizen commentary teams, media representatives, authorities officers, armed forces, and election consultants. Given its restricted numbers, the Carter Heart’s direct observations had been restricted, particularly on election day.

The Heart has noticed 124 elections in 43 nations and is dedicated to neutral and unbiased election commentary that gives transparency in election processes with the target of encouraging processes that meet worldwide requirements for democratic elections. The Carter Heart will publish a ultimate report of its commentary mission, documenting the findings indicated on this assertion.